The Good, the Bad and the Negative
Jay Stone (science) and Berit Greinke (design)…

Science and design have much in common. Both require imagination, innovation and dedication. However, their methodologies differ somewhat. A scientific failure might be a design success. What if design principles were applied to science?
Science is structured and clearly defined; researchers begin with a hypothesis and devise experiments to test the theory. Although unbiased in its process, the scientist hopes to support their hypothesis with positive data. All too often experiments don’t work out that way and the result is termed ‘negative data’. The lucky or clever scientist might later find such negative data to prompt a major discovery, although the more frequent end result is nothing but frustration. Avenues of investigation may thus be dropped in favour of experiments that are ‘working’.
…
Design is not so much about right or wrong answers but questioning the way we interact with the world. Berit Greinke (designer) and Jay Stone (scientist) have been inspired by their different perspectives to see if design could teach science a ‘new trick’.
…
The Good, the Bad and the Negative celebrates laboratory disaster. A maze table invites the public to explore hidden successes in apparent cul-de-sacs. And ‘living’ textiles, created from a series of experiments probing camel hair as a substrate for bacterial growth, question the nature of success and failure.
…
More reading: Science behind the design, by Jay Stone
…
NOBELini Award, funded by Central St Martins College of Art and Design
and the Medical Research Council
‘The Good, the Bad and the Negative’ has been supported and funded
by London Printworks Trust.
A special thank you to collaborator Maik Ronz from Raumarbeiter.
Proposal
Mudchute Farm
Raw materials 
First samples
Samples
Exhibition Dana Centre (Photo: Cléon Daniel)
Maze Table (Design: Maik Ronz, Photo: David Nelson)

